5th
Sunday of Lent (Year C)
First
Reading: Isaiah 43:16-21 Second
Reading: Philippians 3:8-14 Gospel
Reading: John 8:1-11
“NEITHER DO I CONDEMN YOU. GO, AND FROM NOW ON DO NOT SIN ANY MORE.”
Once
a mother sought from Napoleon the pardon of her young and only son,
who was in the French army. The Emperor said it was the man's second
offense, and justice demanded his death.
“I
don't ask for justice,” said the mother. “I plead for
mercy.”
“But,”
said the Emperor, “he does not deserve mercy.”
“Sir,”
cried the mother, “it would not be mercy if he deserved it, and
mercy is all I ask.”
“Well
then,” said the Emperor, “I
will have mercy.” And her
son was saved.
Yes, Jesus too gives us mercy. And we
do not deserve it.
Today is the 5th Sunday of Lent, and it is the last Sunday before Holy week. A week from today, we will be celebrating Palm Sunday which ushers in Holy Week. Today, we take a little rest from the Gospel of St. Luke and look at an incident from the Gospel of St. John, but it, too, is something which is in the same thematic vein that we have been looking at this Lent, i.e. it continues to underline the radical nature of God’s compassion and forgiving love. All is not lost for the sinner, however big his/her offense may be. There is always mercy, forgiveness and conversion.
Today's Gospel Reading is the episode of “The Woman Caught in Adultery.” The actual story is a little bit of problem, however, for it does not appear in the earliest known manuscripts we have of the Gospel of St. John, while it has even been found in texts of St. Luke’s Gospel as well. Many scholars think, therefore, that it properly belongs to the Gospel of St. Luke, because it reflects themes that are dear to St. Luke, such as, concern for sinners, interest in women, and the compassion of Jesus. They surmise that it may have initially been censored because of its delicate subject matter, only to find itself, eventually, awkwardly inserted into the Gospel of St. John.
“Teacher, this woman was caught in the very act of committing adultery.”
The
scribes and Pharisees brought a woman to Jesus and making
her stand in the middle, they said to him: “Teacher,
this woman was caught in the very act of committing adultery. Now,
in the law, Moses commanded us to stone such women. So what do you
say?”
Now,
we
are told nothing of the precise circumstances of the woman ‘taken
in adultery.’
We do know that she could not have been ‘taken’
alone; there would have also been a man somewhere in the wings who
was at least as guilty as the woman. But only
the woman is ‘brought’
to Jesus in the public arena, a spectacle for the assembled crowd.
Here the social context is also important. Adultery was seen as an
affront to the honor of the man. This was a male dominated society.
Women were mere possessions. As we know, it takes two to commit
adultery, but the Jewish laws were only
against women.
Outwardly,
it seemed to be a warranted act against a lawbreaker and this woman
should have been brought normally to the Sanhedrin, a group of
religious elders who pass judgment on most cases (However, the Romans
had taken away the Jewish rights to capital punishment; so, they were
not allowed to kill anyone or they would be going against Roman law).
In this case, however, the scribes and Pharisees in question were
more interested because of the fortuitous opportunity it offered them
to discredit Jesus. So, they brought her to Jesus. The Gospel writer
explains: “They
said this to test him, so that they could have some charge against
him.”
The scribes and Pharisees were pointing their fingers at the
adulterous woman as 'the
accused,'
but their real
intent was to build a case against Jesus, the one they truly wished
to accuse. The sinful woman was being used as a pawn in their ploy to
trap Jesus in a very difficult case, in which any
solution he would give would work to his disadvantage. If, as they
suspected, he counseled mercy and forgiveness, and exempted the woman
from Jewish law, they could accuse him of publicly flouting the Law
and undermining social standards, and he would lose credibility as a
religious leader. If, on the other hand, he affirmed the Law and
condemned the woman, he would be seen to be complicit in the woman's
murder, and to contradict the values he proposed to others – and
hence lose face before the crowd, and also he would be in defiance of
Roman authorities and be accused as a rebel. It was a dilemma - and
the trap appeared inescapable.
“Let the one among you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.”
Jesus
did not dignify their manipulation with a response. He responded by
not responding. His response to the
quandary was a symbolic
action, by which he
took away their power over the woman.
According to the Gospel writer: “Jesus
bent down and began to write on the ground with his finger.”
First
of all, he slowed them down. They came, a group of them together,
strong and certain in their judgment. There was a moment
of silence
while Jesus wrote with his finger in the dust. He wasn’t writing
words for them to read, but giving them time to realize what they
were doing.
But
the leaders were insistent and kept asking Jesus to provide a ruling
concerning the woman’s fate, and the crowd was waiting for the go
signal.
At last, Jesus arose and surprised them all by suggesting that the
innocent party begin the execution -
“Let
the one among you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at
her.”
By
saying this he
poured water on the group’s ardor to stone the woman. Definitely,
he did not tell them that the woman was innocent of the charge.
Rather, he
subverted their ploy by confronting them with their own sinfulness;
he
forced them to go over their own personal histories of sin and if
they found themselves innocent, then they could cast the first stone.
After
he had given his statement, however, Jesus bent down
again and
wrote on the ground, in a symbolic action made more powerful and
meaningful by the words he had just spoken. He
gave them more time in total
silence.
They
had come with one voice condemning. Now each of them thought about
the challenge Jesus put to them. To
their credit, not one of them took up the challenge. The oldest
members of the group were the first to recognize how Jesus had played
the trump card. They were the first to react and one by one, all
slipped away quietly out of his sight till Jesus was alone with the
woman.
For
centuries, speculation has been rife as to what Jesus actually wrote
or traced on the ground. But there
is no sure way of knowing what Jesus wrote; it may be that he merely
wished to show he was unmoved by the accusations of the
self-righteous and refused to walk into their all too obvious trap.
“Neither
do I condemn you. Go, and from now on do not sin any more.”
The
last scene of today’s Gospel episode portrays with exquisite beauty
the poignant encounter between the adulterous woman and Jesus, the
source of forgiveness and grace. One by one the accusers had left the
place. Only the woman remained, still waiting for the rest of her
sentence. She
was finally accorded the dignity of responding for herself. Jesus
straightened up and asked her two questions that would gently
underline her astounding experience of salvation: “Woman,
where are they? Has no one condemned you?” When the
redeemed woman answered that there was no one, Jesus exercised his
authority, not as a judge, but as a savior. Unlike the Pharisees and
Scribes, upholders of the Law, he refused to condemn her. “Neither
do I condemn you. Go, and from now on do not sin any more.”
By saying this Jesus
didn't mean that the woman didn’t do any wrong. No way did Jesus
approve of her sin, but instead, he showed mercy to her and pardoned
her. And he readily gave her a compassionate admonition that would
radically set her on the road of conversion and restoration. She
was freed from the burden of condemnation and
was sent on her way - contrite and resolute, not only to obey the law
for the law’s sake but to renew her conscience and to reform
her behavior according to the loving mercy that had been shown her.
And, as for the woman’s
accusers, Jesus redirected their judgmental frame of mind. Instead of
judging others, they should judge themselves. Jesus
did not condemn them either, but he helped them to come to their
senses and realize their
sinfulness.
Two kinds of sinners...
We
might say there are two kinds of sinners in today’s
Gospel passage. First, there is the
woman who was caught in the act of adultery,
a very serious matter. But in this story, the
Scribes and Pharisees
are also sinners, not in their own eyes, of course, but in the eyes
of Jesus and his Gospel. They are totally lacking in the compassion
that God displays and which he expects his followers to have. They
are proud and arrogant, they give themselves the prerogative to sit
in judgment on others.
Now,
the
Israelite people
– they were God's chosen people. God established a covenant with
them and made them His own. The relationship of God with the
Israelite people was often looked upon as a marriage – Israel the
bride and God the bridegroom. But it happened so often that the
Israelite people were unfaithful to the covenant; many times they
abandoned their God and went after pagan gods. They behaved like an
adulterous
wife. They actually prefigure 'the
adulterous woman'
of today's Gospel passage. But God out of compassion, love and mercy
for them, ever sought for them and always forgave them. In the First
Reading of today from the Book of the Prophet Isaiah, the author
delivers a message of great hope
and promise
to the Israelite people who are in exile.
The prophet exhorts his fellow Israelites to look to the past and to
remember the wondrous acts of their God, all through the stages of
their development as a people. But, while reminding his
contemporaries of their history, he challenges them not to 'dwell'
in
the past for its own sake, but to take
'hope'
from
the
past and look for similar divine acts of mercy
and power
in the future: “The
things of long ago consider not; see I am doing something new!”
i.e.
God will transform their future and usher in a new age.
Again,
St.
Paul
– a jealous and self-righteous Pharisee, who took pride in the
Jewish religion and persecuted the first Christians. In his earlier
life, he just acted like 'the
Scribes and Pharisees'
in the Gospel passage of today. But his encounter with the Risen Lord
on the road to Damascus brought him down to his senses, and later he
became a zealous apostle ready to suffer and give his life for
Christ. In the Second Reading of today in his Letter to the
Philippians, St. Paul says - “I
want to know Christ and the power of his resurrection and the sharing
of his sufferings by becoming like him in his death.”
He further recalls that he has given up everything to make room for
Christ in his life. He knows it isn't easy to do this. But in the
end, he will share in Christ's Resurrection. That is why Paul
describes himself as a runner, pushing on toward the finish line.
…
and they represent all of us.
As
a penitential season, Lent is an invitation for us to recall our
sinfulness in a particular way. The woman
in this story is not just an isolated sinner. She represents all of
us. She represents every person who has sinned. She represents you
and me. But, the
real focus of the narrative should be on the attitude of the
self-appointed, righteous ones, the Scribes and Pharisees, whose
harsh judgment of the woman clouded their consciences to their own
sinfulness. They are sinners too, and also represent
you and me. We sin in both ways - when we hurt others by indulging
our desires at their expense and when we hurt others by setting
ourselves up as superior and better than they.
The image
of Jesus, though, is one of kindness and hope with the woman caught
in adultery, so also with the Scribes and Pharisees. He doesn’t say
that the woman didn’t sin, or the Scribes and Pharisees were
innocent. And, he neither condemned them nor punished them; instead
he showed them his compassion and mercy, and exhorted to sin no more.
Jesus
offers that same compassion and mercy to each one of us, and also
says to us - “NEITHER
DO I CONDEMN YOU. GO, AND FROM NOW ON DO NOT SIN ANY MORE.”
He
does not expect perfection of us. However, he expects us to strive
for perfection. And this is today's Good News.
****************************
Wow!... As usual, you present an insightful reflection which gives much spiritual "food for thought" and reaches deep into the soul. Thank you Fr. Albert.
ReplyDeleteThank you fr
ReplyDelete